Shipping Struggles to Define Decarbonization

Shipping Struggles to Define Decarbonization

The shipping industry has no clear understanding of how to define decarbonization | #no clear understanding of how to define decarbonization |, a new poll suggests.
———————————-
The Poll: Defining Decarbonization
———————————-
The poll was prompted by Greg Atkinson, chief technical officer at Japan’s Eco Marine Power, and gave readers seven different definitions of “decarbonization.” It asked readers to give the best fit for their understanding of what the term means.
The first four responses were taken from websites of a university, a major automaker, a research paper, and a safety and standards board. The last three were definitions proposed by Atkinson.
For Atkinson, this is important because a lack of definitions means it is inherently harder to set goals and work toward them. How can one set targets for reducing emissions and achieving decarbonization when these terms are not clearly defined?
———————
Definitions and Goals
———————
To give an important example, what exactly is a zero emissions ship | Learn more on Commonshare |? Is it a vessel that uses a form of propulsive power that emits no emissions? What about shore-based emissions?
A ship using electrical propulsion powered by batteries would produce no emissions. However, the batteries might be recharged from electricity generated by a coal-fired power plant. Surely that is not a zero emissions ship? Or could the carbon generated by the power plant be offset by planting trees?
Even evaluating what “emissions” means gets one into semantic problems. It could mean all airborne emissions. Or it could simply mean all greenhouse gas emissions. A third definition is only carbon dioxide.
Decarbonization can mean anything from reducing carbon dioxide emissions to removing carbon in various, vague-sounding ways from economies and societies.
Atkinson’s poll showed no clear leader. However, a majority did gravitate toward the definitions Atkinson himself invented.
———————
Future Proof Shipping
———————
Future Proof Shipping CEO Richard Klatten has clear views on this subject, and his company has plans to construct 10 zero-emissions | Learn more on Commonshare | inland and short-sea vessels in the next five years.
Klatten explains that in order to set sustainable boundaries, his company has “subscribed to the Global Maritime Forum list of zero carbon energy sources and align our energy sourcing with the hydrogen and synthetic non-carbon fuels category, which means zero GHG emissions.”
Klatten argues that in order to enable the transition to a decarbonized shipping sector, “zero carbon energy sources” should be understood to cover those energy sources and fuels | Learn more on Commonshare | that collectively have the potential to be scalable for supplying all of the shipping sector’s energy demand in 2050.
Lexicon:
No clear understanding of how to define decarbonization | https://splash247.com/shipping-all-at-sea-when-it-comes-to-defining-decarbonisation-2/ |: source from splash247 website

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *